*Opposition NPP may shun event
LAGOS — SIX days to the January 7 swearing-in of Ghana’s
President-elect, John Dramani Mahama, 11 heads of state including
President Goodluck Jonathan, have confirmed their participation in the
historic event. Delegations are also expected from 18 governments across
the world.
World leaders expected include Faure Gnassingbe of Togo, Mahamadou
Isoufou of Niger, Blaise Compaore of Burkina Faso, Alassane Ouattara of
Cote d’Ivoire and African Union (AU) Chairman, President Thomas Yayi
Boni of Benin Republic.
Presidential Transition Team spokesperson, Mr. James Agyenim-Boateng,
reportedly said in Accra that “all is set for the inaugural ceremony on
January 7” and invitations had been extended to 50,000 guests
world-wide.
Work on the ceremonial ground, he disclosed, would begin tomorrow and
completed on January 5, adding that the team had received all hand-over
notes from ministers and government appointees.
Opposition NPP may shun event
Meanwhile, there were indications that opposition New Patriotic
Party, NPP, may shun the event on account of alleged irregularities that
marred the polls over which it filed a petition at the Supreme Court on
December 29.
NPP Director of Communications, Nana Akomea, said the party was yet
to confirm whether or not it would attend the inauguration of President
Mahama on Saturday. If it fails to attend, it would be the first time a
main opposition party is shunning the inauguration of a president-elect
since the return of democracy in 1992.
Akomea noted that he was uncertain the party would send
representatives to the event. However, he said the party’s decision
would be informed by legal advice, saying they would attend if their
presence would not invalidate their case before the Supreme Court.
“If lawyers so advise that your presence there when you believe that
the whole process is based on an illegality and your presence there
compromises you, the legal opinion will hold sway,” he said.
Meanwhile, NPP Presidential candidate, Nana Akufo-Addo, told
journalists after filing the challenge with the Supreme Court that the
alleged discrepancies were too large to ignore.